For a while, I have been concerned about the format in which students are assessed. Currently, each student is assessed with the same assessment. If modifications are needed, they are made. Well, my question is "why are all students taking the same assessment?". There are two answers (possibly more) to that question: 1) That is the traditional way and less work; and 2) parents expect paper and pencil assessments--they want to see the assessment.
Paper and pencil assessments may not be the most appropriate for every student. I have recently started exploring other options for assessment with my second graders. I have recorded the assessments and provided a different assessment based on the students' needs. Students are able to complete their assessment on the computer. I am also incorporating the assessments via the ActivBoard and ActivVotes (visual, auditory, and kinesthetic). This makes the assessment a little more engaging for second graders.
One of my colleagues develops and shares rubrics used to assess writing. Rubrics are shared with the students prior to the
assignment so they know the requirements. They are also able to assess
themselves. We also use a rubric to share the results of presentations made by students. Rubrics are shared with the students and parents prior to the presentation so that they know the expectation.
My goal this year is to work on developing different forms of assessment for my students. Each student has a talent/strength, and it needs to be used as part of the assessment process. For example, I have a student who is so intrigued when I am videotaping or capturing pictures. I would love to allow him to use the video camera to showcase his knowledge about a particular topic (it would serve as his assessment).
As I introduce more PBL projects to my students, I must develop rubrics to assess their artifacts/products. I am thankful for RubiStar. Off, to plan...